From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14594 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2009 11:36:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 14576 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jul 2009 11:36:48 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090730113648.14575.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/40867] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: StackTrace2 output - source compiled test In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-30 11:36 ------- Hmm, this seems to me as a rather perverse interpretation of the rule that "Java issues are not release-critical": this bug may be manifested in Java programs, but there is no evidence of which I'm aware that this specifically is a Java issue. It seems to be coincident with the gimplify unit-at-a-time patch. I'll try to figure out what is going wrong. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40867