From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9292 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2009 16:58:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 9273 invoked by uid 48); 1 Sep 2009 16:58:31 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20090901165831.9271.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q3/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 16:58 ------- I think it isn't correct to use "gcc" directly. You probably have to introduce a new variable. But, I don't see why we need ecjx.cc at all. I think it must be to work around some other problem. Maybe instead we could just fix that problem directly. Apparently it came in here, though I don't see why: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2008-q4/msg00067.html See also PR 38396 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868