public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jlpoole at pon dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/42409] org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.GCCMain not found Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 02:31:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20100105023142.23125.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-42409-18569@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #10 from jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-01-05 02:31 ------- http://gcc.gnu.org/install/finalinstall.html has: vvvvv ... We strongly recommend to install into a target directory where there is no previous version of GCC present. ... Installation into a temporary staging area or into a chroot jail can be achieved with the command make DESTDIR=path-to-rootdir install where path-to-rootdir is the absolute path of a directory relative to which all installation paths will be interpreted. Note that the directory specified by DESTDIR need not exist yet; it will be created if necessary. ^^^^^ I think those very words caused me to think what I did was a correct way of isolating the compiler without affecting my existing one. "make" has finished (about 21 hours) and I ran: make check-target-libjava which produced: === libjava Summary === # of expected passes 2561 # of unexpected failures 6 # of untested testcases 6 Question: In light of the documentation quoted above, if I do not use the DESTDIR, then to install, should I simply run: make install and my previous use of --prefix=/usr/local/gcj will cause everything to go under /usr/local/gcj and not affect my existing gcc? I'm really nervous that running make install will cause it to supplant my existing GCC. I also want to make sure there is not an additional parameter that should be provided to assure isolation of this installation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42409
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-05 2:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2009-12-17 17:54 [Bug java/42409] New: " jlpoole at pon dot net 2009-12-24 16:23 ` [Bug java/42409] " jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-01-03 18:21 ` jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-01-03 18:23 ` jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-01-03 18:30 ` jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-01-03 18:43 ` jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-01-03 18:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 1:51 ` jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-01-04 11:32 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 14:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 2:31 ` jlpoole at pon dot net [this message] 2010-01-05 2:34 ` jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-01-07 14:26 ` jlpoole at pon dot net 2010-03-20 0:10 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20100105023142.23125.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=java-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).