From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21102 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2010 08:44:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 21082 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jan 2010 08:44:00 -0000 Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 08:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100109084400.21081.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "davek at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 08:43 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=19520) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19520&action=view) [edit] > gzipped text > > oh my. it counts more than 65535.. [167929] !LOL! That's rather a lot! > and gzipped file exceed limit 1000k so i can't attach it at once. No, OK, never mind; we have found the problem! > --export-all-symbols was added because of undefined symbol error. Well it is the wrong answer; as you can see it is too crude. It is vital that the version script is applied to filter out the undesired symbols from being exported. Where did the undefined symbols come from? They must also be a result of that patch somehow, no? Do you get any problem at all from plain unmodified GCC head? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42658