From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3485 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2010 23:48:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 3456 invoked by uid 48); 22 Mar 2010 23:48:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100322234824.3455.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q1/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #27 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 23:48 ------- The ARM ABI permits merging of unwind entries, so this should never default to opt-in across the entire tool-chain. It might be that when GCC links java programs that it should pass an option to the linker to disable the optimization, but that's a different story. It may be that the java unwinder will need to just do more work to figure out the real call sequence. I'm not sufficiently familiar with the code to know the answer here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860