From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22029 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2010 17:02:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 21754 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2010 17:02:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100413170234.21753.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/40860] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aph at redhat dot com" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #37 from aph at redhat dot com 2010-04-13 17:02 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on arm-linux On 04/13/2010 05:52 PM, mikpe at it dot uu dot se wrote: >> Is it maybe the case that "Compact model 1" unwinder data isn't yet being >> merged? > > They have to be adjacent to be merged. Looks like there's something else > between f2 and f1 in your object code. (You are using binutils >= 2.20 right?) Yes. OK, that explains it: gcc trunk outputs the functions in a completely different order. Andrew. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40860