From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19942 invoked by alias); 10 May 2010 20:54:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 19922 invoked by uid 48); 10 May 2010 20:54:17 -0000 Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100510205417.19921.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/42811] [4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "davek at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #17 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-10 20:54 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > On alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu, I'm getting: > FAIL: leaktest > 1 of 4 tests failed > Is this failure something to worry about? The honest answer is: I can't tell you. These are test cases that come with the boehm-gc itself, that have previously been disabled in the gcc import, now I re-enabled them. You won't be suffering from any problem that you didn't already suffer from, in particular w.r.t the use of boehm-gc in libjava, but while it's possible this is a false positive dependent on the precise details of the platform, it's also possible this points to a real unfixed bug. I don't know of any way to tell without really getting down into debugging the internals of the GC to see why it's complaining. But, it's only a new failure because the test didn't used to be run before at all. You're definitely no worse off than you used to be; just now, you know it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811