From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18393 invoked by alias); 12 May 2010 22:20:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 18370 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2010 22:20:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20100512222031.18369.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/42811] [4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org From: "davek at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q2/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #23 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 22:20 ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Hm, I'm not able to run thread_test.c and thread_leak_test.c tests using "make > -k check", so otherwise deadly trivial patch can't be fully tested. > Well I can't approve it but I think it's as close to "obvious" as anything gets. If you send it to libjava-patches (and cc the upstream list for boehm-gc: - we're trying to avoid any divergence), I can't imagine anyone would object. Thanks for helping track this down :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811