From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-11136-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16273 invoked by alias); 22 May 2011 15:52:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 16249 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2011 15:52:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:52:10 +0000
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17731] sub-optimal code generated for left
 shift
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-17731-8172-rKFbGEMA2i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-17731-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-17731-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 15:52:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-prs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17731

Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
   Last reconfirmed|2006-01-16 06:19:32         |2011-05-22 17:27:32
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-22 15:30:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Yes, that's fine.
> The java front end generates trees like <shift op <and op 31>>.
> I would like the extra "and" to be optimized out somewhere
> along the way, on a target-specific basis.

Fixed by tree-ssa::

$ cat t.c
int shift (int x, int y)
{
  int _y = y & 31;
  return x << _y;
}

$ ./cc1 -quiet -m32 -O2 t.c -fdump-tree-optimized
$ cat t.s 
    .file    "t.c"
    .text
    .p2align 4,,15
    .globl    shift
    .type    shift, @function
shift:
.LFB0:
    .cfi_startproc
    movl    4(%esp), %eax
    movl    8(%esp), %ecx
    sall    %cl, %eax
    ret
    .cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
    .size    shift, .-shift
    .ident    "GCC: (GNU) 4.6.0 20110312 (experimental) [trunk revision
170907]"
    .section    .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits