public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug java/21855] array bounds checking elimination
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-21855-8172-cpwITztEVU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-21855-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21855

--- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-10 16:30:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> > (In reply to comment #14)
> > > (In reply to comment #13)
> > > > We can't optimize this because System.out.println can change args[].
> > > 
> > > That's the whole point: System.out.println cannot change args[], which is a
> > > java array, and the length of a Java array is constant.  It is not an invalid
> > > test case.
> > 
> > I suppose
> > 
> >   public static void main(String[] args)
> > 
> > is passing args by value (but the implementation detail uses reference
> > passing for efficiency?).
> 
> args is indeed a reference to a Java array.  The length field of a Java
> array is immutable.  The elements of an array are not immutable.

You mean that System.out.println could change the elements of the array
(well, it doesn't, but theoretically it could)?

> > In this case the Java frontend should do
> > like the C++ frontend and tell this to the middle-end by properly
> > marking args as 1) DECL_BY_REFERENCE, 2) use a TYPE_RESTRICT qualified
> > pointer for the reference.  Then we would optimize this case.
> 
> If we could mark the length field as immutable that would fix it.  Is there any
> way to do that?

No.  What you can do is, via the method I outlined, tell GCC that
args is to be treated similar to a local automatic variable - thus
it cannot be refered to from other functions (unless you pass them
its address of course).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-10 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-21855-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-10 15:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/21855] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 15:53 ` aph at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 16:20 ` [Bug java/21855] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 16:28 ` aph at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 16:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2012-01-10 16:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 16:46 ` aph at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 16:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 16:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 17:08 ` aph at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 17:18 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-10 17:22 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-20 15:08 ` aph at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-21855-8172-cpwITztEVU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=java-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).