From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19506 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2012 11:20:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 19485 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2012 11:20:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:19:58 +0000 From: "rmathew at gcc dot gnu.org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/23856] Modification Time Incorrectly Set From Extension Entry Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:20:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcj X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: rmathew at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23856 --- Comment #4 from Ranjit Mathew 2012-01-12 11:19:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I have a feeling there have been changes in this area since this report (and > the reporter does state that he was using an old version then). However, there > doesn't seem to be an easy way of ensuring this without a zip file with the > known issue to test against. Is one available? See the attachments in: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23854