From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-7252-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12951 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2005 11:47:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 12928 invoked by uid 48); 24 Nov 2005 11:47:37 -0000
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:47:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug libgcj/25016]  New: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-25016-511@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00394.txt.bz2
List-Id: <java-prs.sourceware.org>

_Jv_CondWait makes no allowances for the possibility of an integer
overflow, and this means we can return too early.

This causes very hard to track down bugs.  See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161483


-- 
           Summary: Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libgcj
        AssignedTo: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016