public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/26624] New: make install too slow due to CNI header installation
@ 2006-03-09 21:41 fitzsim at redhat dot com
2006-03-12 19:41 ` [Bug libgcj/26624] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-31 23:26 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: fitzsim at redhat dot com @ 2006-03-09 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
"make install" in libgcj is currently very slow compared to "make install-exec"
because of the number of CNI headers and how they are installed, that is one
install command per header. This should be sped up so that we can simply use
"make install" on rebuilds since this is most likely what the uninitiated will
use.
--
Summary: make install too slow due to CNI header installation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26624
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/26624] make install too slow due to CNI header installation
2006-03-09 21:41 [Bug java/26624] New: make install too slow due to CNI header installation fitzsim at redhat dot com
@ 2006-03-12 19:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-31 23:26 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-12 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-12 19:41 -------
it is not that slow at least on my two machines but it is still about 2x slower
than when java is disabled.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-12 19:41:49
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26624
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/26624] make install too slow due to CNI header installation
2006-03-09 21:41 [Bug java/26624] New: make install too slow due to CNI header installation fitzsim at redhat dot com
2006-03-12 19:41 ` [Bug libgcj/26624] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-31 23:26 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-31 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: java-prs
------- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 23:26 -------
I wrote a little script to print the amount of time taken for each
line of 'make' output.
This tends to confirm that installing the headers is very slow.
One other difference from 'make install-exec' is that the ordinary
install spends 24 seconds doing nothing in classpath/lib.
This is the already known problem that 'make' gets very large and
hits swap.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26624
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-31 23:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-09 21:41 [Bug java/26624] New: make install too slow due to CNI header installation fitzsim at redhat dot com
2006-03-12 19:41 ` [Bug libgcj/26624] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-31 23:26 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).