From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 36172 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2019 21:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 36149 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jan 2019 21:43:00 -0000 From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug classpath/29304] autoconf should be used in libjava to check for fabs, fabsf and scalbn Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 21:43:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: classpath X-Bugzilla-Component: classpath X-Bugzilla-Version: 0.15 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29304 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew John Hughes from comment #3) > No, this is a Classpath bug. Nothing to do with GCJ. Does it make sense for Classpath and GCC to continue to share a bugzilla th= ese days? This is far from the only time I've been confused by it... would it be possible to split them into 2 separate bug databases? >>From java-prs-return-12233-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 02 21:48:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47297 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2019 21:48:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47245 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jan 2019 21:48:54 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug classpath/29304] autoconf should be used in libjava to check for fabs, fabsf and scalbn Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 21:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: classpath X-Bugzilla-Component: classpath X-Bugzilla-Version: 0.15 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Content-length: 835 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D29304 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew John Hughes from comment #3) > > No, this is a Classpath bug. Nothing to do with GCJ. >=20 > Does it make sense for Classpath and GCC to continue to share a bugzilla > these days? This is far from the only time I've been confused by it... wo= uld > it be possible to split them into 2 separate bug databases? I am less confused by the sharing because I know the history (I was one of = the folks who prompted the sharing). I don't think it hurts having the classpa= th in GCC's bugzilla and I normally monitor classpath's bug list for accidental usage there (there was one today but it only happens once every two months = so it is low traffic). >>From java-prs-return-12234-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Dec 20 22:46:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69829 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2019 22:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 69807 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2019 22:46:28 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/64044] Java emits bogus .class$ decls Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: java X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2019-q4/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Content-length: 137 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D64044 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed by r218018