From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-9610-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15233 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2007 14:56:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 15164 invoked by uid 48); 28 Aug 2007 14:56:28 -0000
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:56:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug java/33218]  New: Process.waiFor() Process.destroy() misbehave for childs which are not reacting to Ctrl+C SIGQUIT
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-33218-14857@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "cyberflex at mail dot ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-prs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2

When creating process (Process p = ...) which do not respond to Ctrl+C
then behavior of destroy or waitFor or both is incorrect.

Process blocking/discarding signal sent by Ctrl+C is not killed by destroy().
(The Process.destroy() supposed (IMHO) to kill the child process forcibly.)

After calling destroy() other method waitFor() returns immediately instead of
waiting (survived after the signal) process completion forever.

Such behavior looks to be such  a discrepancy.


Test case:
I encounted the problem when used following command line
rfcomm listen -i hci0 /dev/rfcomm0 6

rfcomm doesn't react to Ctrl+C till external connection is accepted.

Program code:

Process p =    <rfcomm ...>
p.destroy();
p.waitFor()
System.out.println("waitFor completed");





ps ax | grep rfcomm


Workaround for application:
kill such processes explicitly with "kill -9" or
kill subchildren of shell scripts by themselves using shell "trap" command.


Not sure that the issue exists in 4.2.x, I haven't one to test with
architectures I use.


-- 
           Summary: Process.waiFor() Process.destroy() misbehave for childs
                    which are not reacting to Ctrl+C SIGQUIT
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: java
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: cyberflex at mail dot ru
  GCC host triplet: arm_le, x86 - native compilation


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33218