From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29657 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2012 20:11:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 29628 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2012 20:10:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:10:45 +0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/38414] gcc 4.3-20081204 build broken on OS X 10.4 ppc Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcj X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38414 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-02 20:10:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can you suggest some way of testing that hypothesis? Or some way of figuring > out why that build broke when the previous one did not break? What changed? Well rm is failing. That does not make any sense really. Anyways this works for many other people so closing as worksforme.