From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16933 invoked by alias); 20 May 2011 13:15:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 16909 invoked by uid 22791); 20 May 2011 13:15:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GC,TW_JW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 13:14:50 +0000 From: "jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/49077] gcjwebplugin.cc doesn't compile against latest xulrunner 2.0 (firefox-3.6) sdk X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: java X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason.vas.dias at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:15:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q2/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077 --- Comment #5 from Jason Vas Dias 2011-05-20 12:56:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > gcjwebplugin is dead, it should have been removed, but nobody has done that. > Just don't enable it in configure. Well then what replaces the Firefox plugin functionality - ie. what happens when I include '--enable-browser-plugin' in configure args ? A JVM environment and Java SDK is hardly worthy of the name unless it can be used to run java applets embedded in webpages from the system browser - how else is one meant to do this using only GCJ components ? This problem appears to be the ONLY reason gcjwebplugin fails to build ; are you sure rumors of its demise are not premature ?