From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22140 invoked by alias); 31 Dec 2011 00:05:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 22116 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Dec 2011 00:05:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:05:19 +0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: java X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed Ever Confirmed Severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q4/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2011-12-31 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-31 00:05:14 UTC --- >there is many dead code at java source,and the gcj can't remove it. But Java is a dynamic language so the vtable will reference most of it. Can you provide an example of where you think a dead function is not being removed?