From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-11719-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 34494 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2015 21:26:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-prs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34471 invoked by uid 48); 15 Mar 2015 21:26:53 -0000
From: "jojelino at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcj/52579] [4.8/4.9/5 regression]
 i386_w32_fallback_frame_state should care ffi raw-closure stub function
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcj
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jojelino at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-52579-8172-kkIngAgqFv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52579-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52579-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-q1/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52579

gee <jojelino at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from gee <jojelino at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #7)
> This issue seems to be fixed in 5.0 by Richard's work on libffi.
> 
> Could you please check, if issue is fixed for you?

libffi is now have frame information for raw-stub closure of stdcall calling
convention.