From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-11435-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31752 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2012 20:10:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 31564 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Mar 2012 20:10:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=5.0
	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_IB
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:09:53 +0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977
 regressions (libjava failures)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: java
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-52805-8172-eTvVCzsYNu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52805-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52805-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-prs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-03-31
                 CC|                            |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-31 20:08:33 UTC ---
reverting the change does restore libjava function.

- I took a very quick look at the asm output from a "HelloWorld.class" (with
the patch in place) and it seems reasonable.  Presumably, some more complex
case (my example code only has one class) might be misrepresented.