From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4201 invoked by alias); 16 Jul 2012 16:05:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 4181 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jul 2012 16:05:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_GC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:05:15 +0000 From: "dschepler at gmail dot com" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/53982] gij built for x32 can't run a simple Hello World class Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: java X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dschepler at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q3/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Schepler 2012-07-16 16:04:47 UTC --- Update on comment #2: Running through the java files one at a time, I found that just gcj -C -Wall org/jpedal/jbig2/examples/viewer/NavigationToolbar.java fails by itself. The first time, it creates a bunch of dependent .class files and outputs warnings for the sources, but subsequent times, I get just ecj1: arena.c:661: heap_trim: Assertion `p->size == (0|0x1)' failed. gcj: internal compiler error: Aborted (program ecj1) Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. But oddly, that's not 100% reproducible. When I just ran that command 10 times in a row, it failed 6 times out of the 10.