public inbox for java-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mark at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcj/55637] FAIL: sourcelocation output - source compiled test Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 12:02:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-55637-8172-PNQZPMlcAL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-55637-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55637 --- Comment #11 from Mark Wielaard <mark at gcc dot gnu.org> --- It seems somewhat related to the binutils version. The results form comment #10 are with binutils-2.20.51.0.2-5.36.el6.x86_64 If I build and put current binutils trunk on the path the results change (for the worse): PASS: sourcelocation compilation from source PASS: sourcelocation execution - source compiled test FAIL: sourcelocation output - source compiled test PASS: sourcelocation -findirect-dispatch compilation from source PASS: sourcelocation -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: sourcelocation -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test PASS: sourcelocation -O3 compilation from source PASS: sourcelocation -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: sourcelocation -O3 output - source compiled test PASS: sourcelocation -O3 -findirect-dispatch compilation from source PASS: sourcelocation -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: sourcelocation -O3 -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled test Now all output tests fail... hohum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 12:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-12-10 3:47 [Bug libgcj/55637] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08 16:16 ` [Bug libgcj/55637] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 18:14 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-08-09 13:07 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-09-03 15:47 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-09-03 15:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-09-04 10:33 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-09-04 10:34 ` doko at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-09-04 10:38 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-09-04 11:38 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-09-04 11:44 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-09-04 12:02 ` mark at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2014-02-07 15:01 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-07 15:07 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2014-02-20 12:07 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2014-02-20 14:05 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-04-01 10:19 ` dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-04-22 11:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-07-16 13:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-10-30 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:11 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 20:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-26 21:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-55637-8172-PNQZPMlcAL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=java-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).