From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8335 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2014 10:50:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8304 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2014 10:50:04 -0000 From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/64044] Java emits bogus .class$ decls Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 10:50:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: java X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-q4/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64044 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, aph at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64044 > > Andrew Haley changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |aph at redhat dot com > > --- Comment #2 from Andrew Haley --- > So, is the solution to this trivially not to mark the .class$ decls as > TREE_CONST ? Yes, see the patch I proposed (in testing right now, I'll post it and ask for approval later today unless you want to pre-approve here)