From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30037 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2014 23:36:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30023 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2014 23:36:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-we0-f182.google.com Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f182.google.com) (74.125.82.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:36:25 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w62so12516072wes.41 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:36:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.61.65 with SMTP id n1mr17078405wjr.19.1409960182474; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:36:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <54099CDF.8020606@redhat.com> <5409FB08.5070705@redhat.com> From: Brian Jones Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <5409FB08.5070705@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 23:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <-2198182671209371933@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Clarification and apologies (was Re: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system) To: Andrew Haley Cc: Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia , Pekka Enberg , "classpath@gnu.org" , kgy , "java@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2 > On Sep 5, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> On 09/05/2014 06:53 PM, Brian Jones wrote: >> GCJ needs to use IcedTea. > > What for? > Just mean updating to OpenJDK, understanding Java 6,7,8,9,... I always thought fitting into embedded here was a tiny bit technical (only include just what this app needs) & mostly packaging. Brian >> Unfortunately the difference between most Java developers who want >> to compile Java to a native executable and a GCC hacker is vast. > > Hard to argue with that. > > Andrew. >