From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16668 invoked by alias); 7 May 2009 16:28:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 16659 invoked by uid 22791); 7 May 2009 16:28:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wildebeest.demon.nl (HELO gnu.wildebeest.org) (80.101.103.228) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 May 2009 16:28:33 +0000 Received: from fedora.wildebeest.org ([192.168.1.31]) by gnu.wildebeest.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1M26SV-00025q-0j; Thu, 07 May 2009 18:28:31 +0200 Subject: Re: GCJ with OpenJDK Java API instead of GNU Classpath From: Mark Wielaard To: Sal Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4A020407.2090306@gmail.com> References: <4A020407.2090306@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 16:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1241713710.3769.8.camel@fedora.wildebeest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00022.txt.bz2 On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 15:41 -0600, Sal wrote: > - Are there licensing issues with linking OpenJDK to other code via GCJ? The only legal issue is that GNU Classpath is GPLv2+ and OpenJDK is GPLv2 only, so you loose GPLv3 compatibility. Cheers, Mark