public inbox for java@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Java objects obtained by c++: are they garbage collected?
@ 2009-10-16 18:19 Yuri
  2009-10-16 18:35 ` David Daney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yuri @ 2009-10-16 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java

I compiled several Java classes into a shared library and call it's 
methods from C++.
Some of these methods return Java objects.

I wonder do I have to do anything special about them in order for them 
to get garbage collected?

Yuri

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Java objects obtained by c++: are they garbage collected?
  2009-10-16 18:19 Java objects obtained by c++: are they garbage collected? Yuri
@ 2009-10-16 18:35 ` David Daney
  2009-10-16 19:17   ` Yuri
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Daney @ 2009-10-16 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yuri; +Cc: java

Yuri wrote:
> I compiled several Java classes into a shared library and call it's 
> methods from C++.
> Some of these methods return Java objects.
> 
> I wonder do I have to do anything special about them in order for them 
> to get garbage collected?
> 

If you use the CNI facilities to start the runtime and do the calling, 
everything should just work (including garbage collection).

David Daney

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Java objects obtained by c++: are they garbage collected?
  2009-10-16 18:35 ` David Daney
@ 2009-10-16 19:17   ` Yuri
  2009-10-16 19:59     ` Glenn Chambers
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yuri @ 2009-10-16 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Daney; +Cc: java

David Daney wrote:
> Yuri wrote:
>> I compiled several Java classes into a shared library and call it's 
>> methods from C++.
>> Some of these methods return Java objects.
>>
>> I wonder do I have to do anything special about them in order for 
>> them to get garbage collected?
>>
>
> If you use the CNI facilities to start the runtime and do the calling, 
> everything should just work (including garbage collection).

I initialize the runtime using CNI and call methods using dlsym + call 
of that symbol.

Yuri

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Java objects obtained by c++: are they garbage collected?
  2009-10-16 19:17   ` Yuri
@ 2009-10-16 19:59     ` Glenn Chambers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Chambers @ 2009-10-16 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yuri; +Cc: David Daney, java

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 12:17 -0700, Yuri wrote:
> David Daney wrote:

> > If you use the CNI facilities to start the runtime and do the calling, 
> > everything should just work (including garbage collection).
> 
> I initialize the runtime using CNI and call methods using dlsym + call 
> of that symbol.

I saved a bunch of previous messages on the subject in my e-mail folder.

Something that may be relevant to your situation:

Andre Haley wrote:

> I think a bit more clarification is required.
> 
> If you get a reference to a Java object as a result of a function
> call, you must store that reference somewhere that is reachable by the
> collector or that object will be collected.  The collector scans all
> fields of all objects, so something like
> 
>     MyClass::foo = objectRef;
> 
> is sufficient.  Storing the reference in an object in the C++ heap
> will *not* do.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-16 19:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-16 18:19 Java objects obtained by c++: are they garbage collected? Yuri
2009-10-16 18:35 ` David Daney
2009-10-16 19:17   ` Yuri
2009-10-16 19:59     ` Glenn Chambers

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).