From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22032 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2011 14:11:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 22019 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2011 14:11:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_BJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp118.iad.emailsrvr.com (HELO smtp118.iad.emailsrvr.com) (207.97.245.118) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:10:57 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp41.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4A3F9290A86; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:10:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dynamic10.wm-web.iad.mlsrvr.com (dynamic10.wm-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.2.217]) by smtp41.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 024BD290A10; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:10:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from meta-innovation.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dynamic10.wm-web.iad.mlsrvr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA50647880AB; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:10:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by www2.webmail.us (Authenticated sender: nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com, from: nicola.pero@meta-innovation.com) with HTTP; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:10:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:11:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling From: "Nicola Pero" To: "Paul Brook" Cc: "Matthias Klose" , "Andrew Haley" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, "GCC Java" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Type: plain In-Reply-To: <201110171449.26890.paul@codesourcery.com> References: <201108041531.58790.paul@codesourcery.com> <201110101323.00966.paul@codesourcery.com> <4E9C0B03.7070002@ubuntu.com> <201110171449.26890.paul@codesourcery.com> Message-ID: <1318860655.826721257@www2.webmail.us> Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 >> I checked the attached patch, test results at >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/msg01377.html >>=20 >> which are the same as with my suggested patch. >>=20 >> Ok for the trunk? > > I probably don't have authority to approve this, but looks OK to me. The libobjc bits are Ok for trunk. Thanks