From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23082 invoked by alias); 5 Sep 2014 09:39:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23065 invoked by uid 89); 5 Sep 2014 09:39:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:39:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s859dkje006754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 05:39:46 -0400 Received: from [10.36.116.103] (ovpn-116-103.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.103]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s859dhWQ013329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Sep 2014 05:39:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1409909983.4003.13.camel@nirvana.localdomain> Subject: Re: GCJ ------ file type not supported by system From: Mario Torre To: Guillermo Rodriguez Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?And=EF=EF?= , Andrew Haley , "classpath@gnu.org" , kgy , "java@gcc.gnu.org" Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 09:39:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <54089094.5080907@gmail.com> References: <540034B0.4010701@redhat.com> <1409306247.25913.21.camel@nirvana.localdomain> <54043670.4070908@redhat.com> <1409568429.4242.1.camel@nirvana.localdomain> <54089094.5080907@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 18:17 +0200, Guillermo Rodriguez wrote: > I think that updating the website P.S. That counts as a patch as well ;) Cheers, Mario