From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Tromey To: Amancio Hasty Cc: Jeff Sturm , Tom Tromey , java-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: awt or swing support? Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00:00 -0000 Message-id: <200002130058.QAA04567@ferrule.cygnus.com> References: <38A4F15C.5FDD61CD@sigma6.com> <200002120816.AAA32117@rah.star-gate.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q1/msg00224.html >>>>> "Amancio" == Amancio Hasty writes: Amancio> I haven't taken a detailed look at Sun's awt or swing stuff Amancio> however it seems almost intuitive that one should be a able Amancio> to port the JNI stuff to whatever gcj has. I assume that in Amancio> the case of gcj it will mean mapping JNI to CNI and of course Amancio> the respective c routines. Just a high level thought. Oh, I didn't realize that you were approaching the problem with Sun's source. Yes, your plan would work. We are definitely not going to do that, because libgcj is free software, and Sun's JDK is not. libgcj hackers can't even look at Sun's source. Tom