Re: gcc-3.1 2002-04-03 libjava failures on sparc-linux?

["Christian Jönsson" <christian@j-son.org>]

On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:22:36AM +0200, chj wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 10:08:45AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > >>>>> "ChJ" == Christian Jönsson <c.christian.joensson@telia.com> writes:
> > 
> > ChJ> I applied it to Hans et als. gc6.1alpha4 sources, it seems to
> > ChJ> work there.
> > 
> > Great.
> > 
> > ChJ> So Hans, what do we do now? Incorporate your patch into the gcc
> > ChJ> 3.1 branch and trunk? Test it first in gc6.1alpha5?
> > 
> > As I understand it, you couldn't apply this patch to the GC currently
> > in the gcc tree, right?  Could you modify the patch so it applies
> > (apply it by hand somehow) and then test that version of the GC?
> > 
> > If that works, we will definitely check it in.
> 
> I have used the attached patch (based on Hans' first suggested patch).

ehrm, here it is:

*** include/private/gcconfig.h.orig	Tue Apr 16 19:08:52 2002
--- include/private/gcconfig.h	Tue Apr 16 19:14:08 2002
***************
*** 820,830 ****
        extern int _etext[];
  #     define DATAEND (_end)
  #     define SVR4
  #     ifdef __arch64__
- #       define STACKBOTTOM ((ptr_t) 0x80000000000ULL)
  #	define DATASTART (ptr_t)GC_SysVGetDataStart(0x100000, _etext)
  #     else
- #       define STACKBOTTOM ((ptr_t) 0xf0000000)
  #	define DATASTART (ptr_t)GC_SysVGetDataStart(0x10000, _etext)
  #     endif
  #   endif
--- 820,829 ----
        extern int _etext[];
  #     define DATAEND (_end)
  #     define SVR4
+ #     define LINUX_STACKBOTTOM
  #     ifdef __arch64__
  #	define DATASTART (ptr_t)GC_SysVGetDataStart(0x100000, _etext)
  #     else
  #	define DATASTART (ptr_t)GC_SysVGetDataStart(0x10000, _etext)
  #     endif
  #   endif


> The results are good (however, I happened to throw an an additional
> --enable-threads that I know cause troubles on sparc32/linux). 
> 
> I'd say the proposed patch works for sparc32, and I know Hans has
> a proposed patch for "all" sparc targets that I hope is in the process
> of being tested by folks having those arch available.

<snip>

Cheers,

/ChJ