From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: FAIL: PR16923 run at -m64 on i686-apple-darwin9
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081222142129.GB10290@bromo.med.uc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <494F7995.60700@redhat.com>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:27:17AM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Can anyone explain why we always see the failure...
> >
> > Running target unix/-m64
> > FAIL: PR16923 run
> >
> > on i686-apple-darwin9 when gcc trunk is build with...
> >
> > Platform: i686-apple-darwin9
> > configure flags: --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.4 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/share/info --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,java --with-gmp=/sw --with-libiconv-prefix=/sw --with-ppl=/sw --with-cloog=/sw --with-system-zlib --x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib --with-arch=nocona --with-tune=generic --build=i686-apple-darwin9 --host=i686-apple-darwin9 --target=i686-apple-darwin9
> >
> > but apparently this failure disappears when gcc trunk is built
> > with...
> >
> > Platform: i686-apple-darwin9
> > configure flags: --build=i686-apple-darwin9 --host=i686-apple-darwin9 --target=i686-apple-darwin9 --with-gnu-as --with-tune=generic --prefix=/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.4.0 --enable-debug=no --disable-nls --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-java-gc=boehm
>
> I'd have to run it to find out.
>
> > I haven't tried this second form of building FSF gcc locally yet but was wondering if
> > any of the configure options look to be likely candidates for the suppression of this
> > failure. Also exactly is the difference between using -enable-java-gc=boehm and
> > not using that option? I thought java used boehm by default, no?
>
> Yes. It's not necessary to provide this option.
>
> Andrew.
Andrew,
Actually, my mistake. The test results I was looking at wasn't run at
-m64. However it would be nice if one of the java developers who has access
to i686-apple-darwin9 could take a look at this issue and update PR16923 with
any observations on the failure at -m64.
Jack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-22 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-20 22:21 Jack Howarth
2008-12-22 11:27 ` Andrew Haley
2008-12-22 14:22 ` Jack Howarth [this message]
2008-12-22 14:55 ` Andrew Haley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081222142129.GB10290@bromo.med.uc.edu \
--to=howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu \
--cc=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).