From: Stephen Kell <srk31@srcf.ucam.org>
To: java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: CNI and interface methods
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090402193827.GD4939@font.cl.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
Hi,
I'm using CNI for the first time and have hit a query. What exactly is
and isn't supposed to work when invoking interface methods through
*object* references (from C++, so I mean pointers), and passing these
references around?
The CNI chapter in the gcj manual says a lot about interface references,
but not about the case of using object references where that object's
class implements one or more interfaces. One thing that would appear to
be worth mentioning is that clearly, passing them to methods wanting an
interface reference won't compile without some sort of cast, since the
gcjh-generated headers don't encode the subtyping relationship between
interfaces and their implementing classes. I'm guessing a simple static
cast isn't the right thing to do though, because I'm getting segfaults
when I try.
Specifically, I'm CNI-calling from C++ to Java code which, in turn,
makes a call through an interface reference that I previously passed in
to the Java object's constructor (i.e. I passed in an *object*
reference, again from the C++ code, which required a cast as I just
described). I get a segfault during the calling sequence of the
interface call made by the Java code. The fault occurs just before the
call to _Jv_LookupInterfaceMethodIdx.
(This is all on a fresh build of vanilla gcc 4.3.3, on i686 Linux, by
the way.)
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb7f5e8f0 (LWP 26704)]
0x080828ad in cakeJavaParser.toplevel()cakeJavaParser$toplevel_return ()
at cakeJavaParser.java:145
145 retval.start = input.LT(1);
Current language: auto; currently java
(gdb) bt
#0 0x080828ad in
cakeJavaParser.toplevel()cakeJavaParser$toplevel_return ()
at cakeJavaParser.java:145
#1 0x0805a4e2 in cake::request::process (this=@bffd0c18) at cake.cpp:33
#2 0x0805a7da in main (argc=2, argv=@bffd0cd4) at main.cpp:52
(Possibly significant: in earlier test runs, with a previous build of my
code, I was getting the segfault *during* the call to
_Jv_LookupInterfaceMethodIdx, with iface->ioffsets being null when it
probably shouldn't. I can't reproduce that now for some reason.)
The extent of my CNI code is
JvCreateJavaVM(NULL);
JvAttachCurrentThread(NULL, NULL);
JvInitClass(&java::lang::System::class$);
and shortly afterwards
org::antlr::runtime::ANTLRInputStream *stream = new org::antlr::runtime::ANTLRInputStream(in_file);
cakeJavaLexer *lexer = new cakeJavaLexer((org::antlr::runtime::CharStream*) stream);
org::antlr::runtime::CommonTokenStream *tokenStream = new org::antlr::runtime::CommonTokenStream((org::antlr::runtime::TokenSource*) lexer);
cakeJavaParser *parser = new cakeJavaParser((org::antlr::runtime::TokenStream*) tokenStream);
parser->toplevel();
where the last statement triggers the segfault. The toplevel() method is
Java code; it immediately calls a method on lexer (the object I passed
earlier) and it's this call whose dispatch fails.
Should this code work? I thought about class initialization, but having
read the docs, it wouldn't appear that I need to add any JvInitClass
calls manually in this case.
There's a tarball at
<http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~srk31/private/cake-snapshot-20090402.tar.bz2>
which should be sufficient to reproduce the above (just do 'make test'),
unless I've forgotten to include something. Let me know if there's any
more details that would be useful.
Thanks for reading! Any answers or ideas appreciated,
Stephen.
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-02 19:38 Stephen Kell [this message]
2009-04-03 8:37 ` Andrew Haley
2009-04-03 10:35 ` Bryce McKinlay
[not found] ` <7230133d0904030328o55069f0do9147f879bcbd5e4f@mail.gmail.com>
2009-04-03 10:44 ` Andrew Haley
2009-04-03 18:54 ` Stephen Kell
2009-04-03 19:06 ` David Daney
2009-04-04 9:12 ` Andrew Haley
2009-04-03 13:57 ` Stephen Kell
2009-04-03 14:13 ` Andrew Haley
2009-04-03 18:42 ` Stephen Kell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-04-01 0:00 Oskar Liljeblad
2000-04-01 0:00 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090402193827.GD4939@font.cl.cam.ac.uk \
--to=srk31@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).