From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-return-25952-listarch-java=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28829 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2009 13:57:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 28819 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2009 13:57:34 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (HELO ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.135)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:57:21 +0000
Received: from lapwing-gw-1.csx.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.1.66]:47515 helo=ernest-2.christs.cam.ac.uk) 	by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:25) 	with esmtpsa (LOGIN:srk31) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) 	id 1LpjtW-0003g0-Ie (Exim 4.70) 	(return-path <srk31@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:57:18 +0100
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:57:00 -0000
From: Stephen Kell <srk31@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: CNI and interface methods
Message-ID: <20090403135713.2fb36ecc@ernest-2.christs.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <49D5CAD4.8040700@redhat.com>
References: <20090402193827.GD4939@font.cl.cam.ac.uk> 	<49D5CAD4.8040700@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Id: <java.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/>
List-Post: <mailto:java@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:37:40 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
> It's because you're using -Bsymbolic but not -fpic.  -Bsymbolic is
> dangerous, and any use of it without PIC means instant death.  So,
> compile everything PIC, even the executable, and you'll be fine.
> That worked for me on your example.

Thanks for this. I thought I already was compiling everything -fpic,
but maybe I missed something. Was there a particular make rule that was
in need of -fpic, that you altered?  I still can't find it.

(Actually I was using -fPIC, but I've tried again with -fpic instead, in
case it made a difference... still getting the same segfault though.)

Stephen