From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2683 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2010 07:09:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 2666 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2010 07:09:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:09:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0EFCB0269; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xll6ryZ-5DAt; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from province.act-europe.fr (province.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.214]) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3568CB01DD; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by province.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 525) id 7DCB71648A4; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:09:00 -0000 From: Arnaud Charlet To: Eric Botcazou Cc: Richard Henderson , GCC Patches , rguenther@suse.de, joseph@codesourcery.com, jason@redhat.com, java@gcc.gnu.org, ian@airs.com, Olivier Hainque Subject: Re: [RFC] Centralize knowledge of eh personality routines Message-ID: <20101013070921.GA84444@adacore.com> References: <4CB4E841.1090308@redhat.com> <201010130903.00490.ebotcazou@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010130903.00490.ebotcazou@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-10/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 > + case DW_LANG_Ada83: > + case DW_LANG_Ada95: > + prefix = "__gnat_eh_personality"; > + /* The GNAT folk did not follow the standard naming format. > + That can change if we ever have to increment the version. */ > + if (ui == UI_DWARF2 || ui == UI_TARGET) > + unwind = ""; > + version = ""; > + break; > > Let's change that right now, we don't guarantee any ABI compatibility > between different major releases. Olivier, any objections? Looks like a good idea to me, so that we're consistent with other languages and follow the standard naming format. As you said, we don't guarantee ABI compatibility. Arno