From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20889 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2012 18:27:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 20880 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Oct 2012 18:27:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_GC X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail1.intricatesoftware.com (HELO mail1.intricatesoftware.com) (96.56.4.132) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:27:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (relay@mail1.intricatesoftware.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.intricatesoftware.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q99IRiws031821; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:27:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Kurt Miller To: "Boehm, Hans" Subject: Re: gcj 4.6 on OpenBSD/x86 Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:27:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Andrew Haley , David Daney , "java@gcc.gnu.org" References: <201210081607.04804.kurt@intricatesoftware.com> <50742135.3000000@intricatesoftware.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201210091426.54370.kurt@intricatesoftware.com> X-SMTP-Vilter-Version: 1.3.6 X-SMTP-Vilter-Virus-Backend: clamd X-SMTP-Vilter-Status: clean X-SMTP-Vilter-clamd-Virus-Status: clean X-Spamd-Symbols: ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-SMTP-Vilter-Spam-Backend: spamd X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Threshold: 5.0 X-Spam-Probability: -0.6 X-SMTP-Vilter-Unwanted-Backend: attachment X-SMTP-Vilter-attachment-Unwanted-Status: clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 On Tuesday 09 October 2012 01:21:40 pm Boehm, Hans wrote: > It may be worth checking whether the garbage collector tests, particularly gctest, run correctly in your environment. If not, that might give you an easier debugging task. > > Hans Thank you. Will do. I'm quite sure the problem is in the OpenBSD specific ifdefs. It was quite tricky to get it right the first time and OpenBSD has some OS specific quirks that need to be handled right. -Kurt