From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <java-return-9761-listarch-java=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7780 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2002 06:45:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/>
List-Post: <mailto:java@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7736 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2002 06:45:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (210.86.60.220)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Apr 2002 06:45:04 -0000
Received: from waitaki.otago.ac.nz ([192.168.2.2])
	by localhost.localdomain (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g3C6BKT19184;
	Fri, 12 Apr 2002 18:11:21 +1200
Message-ID: <3CB68225.1050906@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:54:00 -0000
From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020327
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
CC: Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com>,
   Carlos Pereira
 <carlos@pehoe.civil.ist.utl.pt>, gcc@gnu.org,
   java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: -R gcc option?
References: <200204111824.TAA04590@pehoe.civil.ist.utl.pt>	<20020411152809.A28097@disaster.basement.lan>	<1018567237.1817.343.camel@dhcppc2>  <3CB62B5E.7000004@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <1018595481.1228.7.camel@dhcppc2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00210.txt.bz2

Anthony Green wrote:

>I don't think I agree about -D.  I don't see how it can conflict with
>the C/C++ version of -D.
>

The problem is that there is no way to set a preprocessor define if you 
want to compile a C++ file with gcj,  eg:

gcj Foo.java natFoo.cc -DFOO

Of course, this is possible to work around by invoking c++ separately.

regards

Bryce.