public inbox for java@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* security with gcj
@ 2008-07-07 11:49 - -
  2008-07-08 20:37 ` Andrew Haley
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: - - @ 2008-07-07 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: java

Hi,
I try to arrange a small application with gcj (binary code generation not 
byte code) under windows and linux operating systems.
I saw under windows that with C# or VB it is possible to "sign" the application.
Tipical commands are "sn" and "al" taking in input some ".snk" files...
Is there any procedure/command to follow also with gcj to sign the executable and verify them?

just as reference in windows the procedure is described in:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xc31ft41.aspx

Thanks.
x10



      

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: security with gcj
  2008-07-07 11:49 security with gcj - -
@ 2008-07-08 20:37 ` Andrew Haley
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Haley @ 2008-07-08 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: decuplo; +Cc: java

- - wrote:

> I try to arrange a small application with gcj (binary code generation not 
> byte code) under windows and linux operating systems.
> I saw under windows that with C# or VB it is possible to "sign" the application.
> Tipical commands are "sn" and "al" taking in input some ".snk" files...
> Is there any procedure/command to follow also with gcj to sign the executable and verify them?

Not really, no.  I'm not sure hos much sense this makes,
in any case: when you install an executable, whether it's
been built by gcj or something else, that's the time to
check that it has been signed by someone you trust.  RPM
provides this facility, as do a bunch of other package
management programs.

Andrew.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: security with gcj
@ 2008-07-09 21:35 - -
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: - - @ 2008-07-09 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Haley; +Cc: java

--- On Tue, 7/8/08, Andrew Haley wrote:

> Not really, no.  I'm not sure hos much sense this
> makes,
> in any case: when you install an executable, whether
> it's
> been built by gcj or something else, that's the time to
> check that it has been signed by someone you trust.  RPM
> provides this facility, as do a bunch of other package
> management programs.

It is quite different the RPM "sign" all the "tar" just before/during
the installation, instead the method with "al" sign the application every
time it is execute, because is the executable itself that will be certified.
x10


      

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-09 21:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-07 11:49 security with gcj - -
2008-07-08 20:37 ` Andrew Haley
2008-07-09 21:35 - -

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).