From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10234 invoked by alias); 6 May 2009 17:08:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 9819 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2009 17:08:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-fx0-f165.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f165.google.com) (209.85.220.165) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 May 2009 17:08:05 +0000 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so279677fxm.8 for ; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.61.13 with SMTP id j13mr1516730fga.48.1241629678764; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?82.6.108.62? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm15573670fgg.25.2009.05.06.10.07.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 06 May 2009 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A01C692.3030202@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 17:08:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bryce McKinlay CC: Andrew Haley , Dave Korn , java@gcc.gnu.org, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig. References: <4A01B55C.6060700@gmail.com> <4A01B621.7020609@gmail.com> <4A01BD26.30707@redhat.com> <7230133d0905060959h5371a608nff03cce1e1e98f47@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7230133d0905060959h5371a608nff03cce1e1e98f47@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Bryce McKinlay wrote: > If you're going to go to all this trouble, why not consider making libgcj > compilable with the BC-ABI. Well, in my case, because I have no idea what that involves or implies. I was hoping to find a solution that I can get in during this current stage1 and it not be the only thing I spend all of stage1 doing. From your disclaimer, it sounds like this might be a slightly longer-term project? cheers, DaveK