From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13260 invoked by alias); 11 May 2009 17:39:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 13246 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2009 17:39:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_83,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 May 2009 17:39:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4BHd7OJ011860; Mon, 11 May 2009 13:39:07 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4BHd6Sv004813; Mon, 11 May 2009 13:39:07 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (vpn-14-75.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.75]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4BHd56A006284; Mon, 11 May 2009 13:39:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4A0862B8.1060409@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081009) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Korn CC: java@gcc.gnu.org, "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig. References: <4A01B55C.6060700@gmail.com> <4A01B621.7020609@gmail.com> <4A01BD26.30707@redhat.com> <4A01C128.2020500@gmail.com> <4A01C4EB.4070408@redhat.com> <4A08641E.4000108@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A08641E.4000108@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 Dave Korn wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > >> Here's a starter list of non-core packages: >> >> gnu/CORBA > > By the time I got done annotating all those packages with "non-core" in > makemake.tcl, it looked like the rule is "all packages of style 'bc' or > 'bcheader'", is that correct? I'd rather infer the list of non-core packages > from the existing annotations if it is correct to do so. Makes sense. Andrew.