From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14192 invoked by alias); 13 May 2009 16:18:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 14176 invoked by uid 22791); 13 May 2009 16:18:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_83,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2009 16:18:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4DGI7Ac009616; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:18:07 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n4DGI6km005945; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:18:06 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (vpn-12-170.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.170]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4DGI4XW022517; Wed, 13 May 2009 12:18:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4A0AF2BB.3080400@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:18:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081009) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Korn CC: Ralf Wildenhues , java@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig. References: <4A01B55C.6060700@gmail.com> <4A01B621.7020609@gmail.com> <20090506161419.GA19953@ins.uni-bonn.de> <4A01C401.4000104@gmail.com> <20090507214936.GB18769@gmx.de> <4A085FAA.6060507@gmail.com> <4A085FB6.7060002@redhat.com> <4A0AC200.9020003@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A0AC200.9020003@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 Dave Korn wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > >> Did you try my list of things to lift out? I don't think there will be any >> interdependencies; the only problem might be that the reduction is not enough. > > Hi Andrew, > > I've had a quick hack at it now, and it's not doing what I'd hoped, so > possibly I've misunderstood what you intended, or am not grokking the > structure of java packages correctly. > > > So, did I do the partitioning wrong here? Or have I misunderstood what you > were referring to as "interdependencies"? Oh, I'm _so_ sorry, you're absolutely right. I misread (or, perhaps, miswrote) the makemake.tcl file. It turns out that even those files that are compiled BC are compiled with -fno-indirect-classes, so that they can be (and indeed are) called from code compiled with the C++ ABI. How embarrassing. :-( Andrew.