From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Ben Gardiner <BenGardiner@nanometrics.ca>
Cc: GCJ <java@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: libSegFault.so and gcj
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0C40E7.6080907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A0C38A1.4010300@nanometrics.ca>
Ben Gardiner wrote:
> We are running a gcj-compiled application on an embedded platform
> (MPC852T). For reference our versions are gcc-4.0.1, glibc-2.3.3 and
> linux-2.4.24 -- I know these versions are ancient, but please don't stop
> reading here.
>
> We sometimes encounter segfaults in our application; that is to say that
> it will terminate with 'Segmentation fault' on the console and return
> 139. These occur rather infrequently, and we have yet to find a reliable
> way to reproduce them. To make things more difficult, we do not have
> room for core dumps on our filesystem.
>
> I thought that we could get the some information about these segfaults
> by using the preload library libSegFault.so; I tested it and integrated
> it with our init scripts and let it loose into our releases hoping that
> a backtrace or two would come back to me. None did; there was no output
> produced by libSegFault.so at all.
>
> I think that since gcj registers its own segfault handler which
> translates segv signals into NullPointerExceptions, the original signals
> never make it to libSegfault's handler. Gcj registers its handler,
> catch_segv (from prims.cc:146 in our version of gcj), in INIT_SEGV
> (powerpc-signal.h:62) called from _Jv_CreateJavaVM (prims.cc:1211). Here
> is a snippet of INIT_SEGV:
>
> #define INIT_SEGV \
> do \
> { \
> struct kernel_old_sigaction kact; \
> kact.k_sa_handler = catch_segv; \
> kact.k_sa_mask = 0; \
> kact.k_sa_flags = 0; \
> if (syscall (SYS_sigaction, SIGSEGV, &kact, NULL) != 0) \
> __asm__ __volatile__ (".long 0"); \
> } \
> while (0)
>
> and of catch_segv:
>
> SIGNAL_HANDLER (catch_segv)
> {
> java::lang::NullPointerException *nullp
> = new java::lang::NullPointerException;
> unblock_signal (SIGSEGV);
> MAKE_THROW_FRAME (nullp);
> throw nullp;
> }
>
> I don't know a whole lot about signal handlers -- please correct me if
> I'm wrong: I think that since the syscall (SYS_sigaction,...) passes
> NULL as the fourth argument, that gcj is disregarding the presence of
> any previously registered signal handlers.
Correct. gcj treats all segfaults as null pointer exceptions.
> I also think that since the
> flags are zero that catch_segv is executed on the same stack as the
> process that threw the signal instead of the alternate stack.
Also correct.
> I reason from this that the segfaults are likely stack overflows. Could
> anyone confirm this?
That's quite possible. Do you not have a debugger?
Clearly if it really is a stack overflow then you're not going to be
able to call the null pointer handler. There is a way around this,
though. If you use the -fstack-check option gcc generates a probe
at the start of every method that writes a zero some 12kbytes below
the stack pointer. This will give you enough stack space for the
catch_segv handler to run.
> Could we patch INIT_SEGV somehow so that signals not caught by
> catch_segv will be passed up so that libSegFault.so can catch them?
No. They're all caught.
Andrew.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-14 15:28 Ben Gardiner
2009-05-14 16:04 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
2009-05-15 9:17 ` Andrew Haley
2009-05-15 20:23 ` Ben Gardiner
2009-05-15 20:49 ` David Daney
2009-05-14 16:10 ` David Daney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0C40E7.6080907@redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=BenGardiner@nanometrics.ca \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).