From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18952 invoked by alias); 21 May 2009 20:36:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 18937 invoked by uid 22791); 21 May 2009 20:36:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,WEIRD_PORT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f157.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f157.google.com) (209.85.219.157) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 May 2009 20:36:24 +0000 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so1605159ewy.8 for ; Thu, 21 May 2009 13:36:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.126.18 with SMTP id y18mr3750205ebc.62.1242938178128; Thu, 21 May 2009 13:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.99? (cpc2-cmbg8-0-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.6.108.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm199493eyg.34.2009.05.21.13.36.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 21 May 2009 13:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A15BDF7.8070709@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:36:00 -0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Korn CC: Bryce McKinlay , java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Question about a comment in _Jv_StackTrace::UnwindTraceFn References: <4A15890E.30001@gmail.com> <7230133d0905211017q18062036s9f42f29ea15bebd8@mail.gmail.com> <4A15A5CD.1000209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A15A5CD.1000209@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 Dave Korn wrote: > ... because we're still in runtime initialisation here: > > (gdb) frame 25 > #25 0x004049af in _Jv_CreateJavaVM (vm_args=0x22ccb0) > at /gnu/gcc/gcc-patched/libjava/prims.cc:1682 > 1682 _Jv_JNI_Init (); Uhh, waittaminnit, no we aren't. Where did I get that from? Certainly wasn't in my original stack dump. Removing the early set didn't help. > So, I think maybe I have *two* problems: *honk!* Make that three ... I'll do some further digging. cheers, DaveK