From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22795 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2009 07:52:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 22786 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2009 07:52:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 07:52:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6J7qXCQ005825; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:52:33 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6J7qVqE004394; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:52:32 -0400 Received: from pearl.pink (vpn-12-5.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.5]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6J7qU3i005719; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:52:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4A62D0B7.6010301@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 07:52:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Florian Weimer CC: Mathieu Malaterre , java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: error: 'jvariant::jvariant(jbyte)' cannot be overloaded References: <87ab31nrc2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> In-Reply-To: <87ab31nrc2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On 07/19/2009 07:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Mathieu Malaterre: > >> I am trying to compile VTK using gcj and I am getting those compiler >> error, could someone please let me know if the code is legal (should >> compile) or not: > > This is legal per Sun's JNI specficiation: jboolean and jbyte are > distinct types because there signedness differs: > > > > It's a bug in GCC. I didn't see the original message to which this is replying. If you can make a test case I'll see if the bug can be fixed. Andrew.