From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 417 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2009 08:41:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 393 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jul 2009 08:41:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:41:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6O8f2Q0009429; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:41:03 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6O8f1nj011957; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:41:02 -0400 Received: from pearl.pink (vpn-12-128.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.128]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6O8exvl016958; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:41:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4A69739C.5020403@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:41:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ronis@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca CC: GCC Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure in 4.4.1 References: <1248365867.14628.7.camel@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca> <4A688DD9.200@redhat.com> <1248366663.14628.14.camel@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca> In-Reply-To: <1248366663.14628.14.camel@ronispc.chem.mcgill.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 On 07/23/2009 06:31 PM, David Ronis wrote: > gjar is in /usr/bin, and gives: > > gjar --version > jar (GNU Classpath) 0.98 > > Isn't this built as part of gcc? It has a similar timestamp as my > installed 4.4.0 gcc. Right: I think that's the one that is crashing. > Finally, shouldn't a bootstrap build use its own gjar? No. it's the just-built jar, and it hasn't been tested yet, and it might not even be for the same architecture as the host machine. > One seems to have been built: > > find -name gjar -ls > 3503030 4 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ronis ronis 2048 Jul 22 > 23:57 ./i686-pc-linux-gnu/libjava/classpath/tools/gjar > > On the other hand, trying to run this version gives: > > ./gjar --version > ./gjar: line 48: /usr/share/classpath/tools.zip: No such file or > directory > ./gjar: line 48: exec: /usr/share/classpath/tools.zip: cannot execute: > No such file or directory > > (In fact, there is no /usr/share/classpath directory). It's not installed yet. If you don't have a working gjar it should be possible to use zip to create the archive. But I would have expected that you should be able to use your distro's gjar. if this crashing program *is* your distro's gjar, then that's another problem. Andrew.