From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31064 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2009 18:16:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 31048 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Aug 2009 18:16:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_33 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail3.caviumnetworks.com (HELO mail3.caviumnetworks.com) (12.108.191.235) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:15:52 +0000 Received: from caexch01.caveonetworks.com (Not Verified[192.168.16.9]) by mail3.caviumnetworks.com with MailMarshal (v6,2,2,3503) id ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:15:22 -0400 Received: from caexch01.caveonetworks.com ([192.168.16.9]) by caexch01.caveonetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:14:44 -0700 Received: from dd1.caveonetworks.com ([64.169.86.201]) by caexch01.caveonetworks.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:14:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4A981E93.7080205@caviumnetworks.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:16:00 -0000 From: David Daney User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Dave Korn , Ralf Wildenhues , java@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [JAVA,libtool] Big libjava is biiiig. References: <4A01B55C.6060700@gmail.com> <4A01B621.7020609@gmail.com> <20090506161419.GA19953@ins.uni-bonn.de> <4A01BA1A.9030801@caviumnetworks.com> <4A8FF4C2.5000700@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Korn writes: > > Dave> There are a couple of regressions to solve first, but it appears > Dave> that I've more-or-less cracked it. Full details are written up > Dave> here: > > Dave> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Internal_dependencies_of_libgcj > > One thing worth considering is that you may be able to shrink things > even more by splitting up some existing objects. > > I didn't see AWT in the cluster 48 list, which seems weird. > I would expect it to be in the core due to AWTPermission. > > I'm curious why sun.awt and swing ended up in there. > > I would expect that with minor tweaks you could probably get AWT, the > peers, and Swing to drop out. That was true for AWT, at least, last > time I looked at this (years ago) -- but I needed a special case to keep > AWTPermission in. I have patches that do a lot of the things Tom mentions. They are only lightly tested, but they could be a starting point. I will dig them out and post them this weekend. David Daney.