From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24543 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2009 23:01:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 24402 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2009 23:01:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from adelie.canonical.com (HELO adelie.canonical.com) (91.189.90.139) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:01:51 +0000 Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1Mt8Ax-0004rx-3Y; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:01:35 +0100 Received: from dslb-088-073-120-178.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.120.178] helo=[192.168.42.17]) by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mt8Ax-0007s4-0E; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:01:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4AC3E34D.3080708@ubuntu.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:01:00 -0000 From: Matthias Klose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090914 Shredder/3.0b4pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Clifton CC: Martin Thuresson , binutils , Tristan Gingold , GCC Java Subject: [regressions in GCC/libjava testsuite] Re: Patch to make bfd compile with -Wc++-compat References: <624836f10909071812q358c0ff8p34ce468ccadb50@mail.gmail.com> <624836f10909082138h1e14eb14j76d08ba0e4d76d0a@mail.gmail.com> <624836f10909082308p349131c5l103efc029e9e26e0@mail.gmail.com> <4AA820CB.3030403@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4AA820CB.3030403@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 On 09.09.2009 23:40, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Martin, > >> Reran make check, make check-gas and make check-ld on x86_64-linux and >> arm-eabi >> and found no regression. > > Approved and applied (mainline and branch). I identified this patch or the one applied to the binutils subdirectory to cause regressions in the GCC/libjava testsuite on the 4.3/4.4 branches and trunk, at least on {x86,x86_64,powerpc}-linux: FAIL: StackTrace2 execution - source compiled test FAIL: StackTrace2 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: StackTrace2 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: stacktrace execution - source compiled test FAIL: stacktrace -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test FAIL: stacktrace -O3 execution - source compiled test FAIL: stacktrace -O3 -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test The tests fail as: set_ld_library_path_env_vars: ld_library_path=.:/scratch/packages/gcc/4.3/u/java/gcj-4.3-4.3.4/build/i486-linux-gnu/./libjava/.libs:/scratch/packages/gcc/4.3/u/java/gcj-4.3-4.3.4/build/gcc invoke: /scratch/packages/gcc/4.3/u/java/gcj-4.3-4.3.4/build/i486-linux-gnu/libjava/testsuite/StackTrace2.exe Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to .:/scratch/packages/gcc/4.3/u/java/gcj-4.3-4.3.4/build/i486-linux-gnu/./libjava/.libs:/scratch/packages/gcc/4.3/u/java/gcj-4.3-4.3.4/build/gcc:.:/scratch/packages/gcc/4.3/u/java/gcj-4.3-4.3.4/build/i486-linux-gnu/./libjava/.libs:/scratch/packages/gcc/4.3/u/java/gcj-4.3-4.3.4/build/gcc Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException *** Got java.lang.NullPointerException while trying to print stack trace. No difference, if binutils is built with 4.3.4 or 4.4.1. Matthias