From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6965 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2009 23:23:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 6954 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2009 23:23:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from adelie.canonical.com (HELO adelie.canonical.com) (91.189.90.139) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:23:49 +0000 Received: from hutte.canonical.com ([91.189.90.181]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1Mt8WE-0007VR-Ca; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:23:34 +0100 Received: from dslb-088-073-120-178.pools.arcor-ip.net ([88.73.120.178] helo=[192.168.42.17]) by hutte.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mt8WE-000881-9S; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:23:34 +0100 Message-ID: <4AC3E875.1010007@ubuntu.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:23:00 -0000 From: Matthias Klose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090914 Shredder/3.0b4pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Clifton CC: Martin Thuresson , binutils , Tristan Gingold , GCC Java Subject: Re: [regressions in GCC/libjava testsuite] Re: Patch to make bfd compile with -Wc++-compat References: <624836f10909071812q358c0ff8p34ce468ccadb50@mail.gmail.com> <624836f10909082138h1e14eb14j76d08ba0e4d76d0a@mail.gmail.com> <624836f10909082308p349131c5l103efc029e9e26e0@mail.gmail.com> <4AA820CB.3030403@redhat.com> <4AC3E34D.3080708@ubuntu.com> In-Reply-To: <4AC3E34D.3080708@ubuntu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 On 01.10.2009 01:01, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 09.09.2009 23:40, Nick Clifton wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >>> Reran make check, make check-gas and make check-ld on x86_64-linux and >>> arm-eabi >>> and found no regression. >> >> Approved and applied (mainline and branch). > > I identified this patch or the one applied to the binutils subdirectory It's the one applied to the binutils subdirectory.