From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12008 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2009 13:01:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 12000 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2009 13:01:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:00:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9JD0q0i026754; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:00:52 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9JD0pUV011063; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:00:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4ADC6302.9010809@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:01:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081009) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Malaterre CC: yuri@rawbw.com, java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Is gcj dead? References: <4AD846B0.2080102@rawbw.com> <4ADAE903.2010009@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> Yuri wrote: >>> Last news in http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ are dated March 2007. >> Yes, we should update that. There hasn't been a lot of new gcj development, >> but it is maintained. >> >>> Also I submitted few PRs a month ago and there is no response at all. >> Which ones? > > How about this one: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40816 I am still rather nervous about that one, as it's an ABI change. Andrew.