From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14099 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2009 14:33:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 14090 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2009 14:33:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:33:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA9EXDnK024553; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:33:14 -0500 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA9EXCTv018826; Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:33:13 -0500 Message-ID: <4AF82827.3030100@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:33:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Howarth CC: java@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gcj segfaults on i686/x86_64-apple-darwin* References: <20091109004028.GA19749@bromo.med.uc.edu> <4AF7D92C.9070100@redhat.com> <20091109141843.GA25666@bromo.med.uc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20091109141843.GA25666@bromo.med.uc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact java-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 Jack Howarth wrote: > Shouldn't the libjava testsuite contain some rudimentary tests using gcj > to make sure it is functional? Sure. > The recent testsuite results don't suggest > major problems with java on intel darwin... > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg00666.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-10/msg01308.html This means that, whatever the cause of the bug, it wasn't present when these tests were run. You can easily verify that yourself by running 'make check-target-libjava'. Andrew.