From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
To: Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew@member.fsf.org>
Cc: java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libgcj 3.4.6 vs 4.x.x
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B44A5A5.4020500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17c6771e1001060557m4422dbf2j296aedffd6e6d7b0@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/06/2010 01:57 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2010/1/6 Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>:
>> On 01/06/2010 12:59 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> 2010/1/6 Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>:
>>>> On 01/06/2010 11:37 AM, abhishek desai wrote:
>>>>> Is there any documentation about the enhancements in gcj/libgcj
>>>>> between versions 3.4.6 and gcc version 4.x.x ? I tried to compare the
>>>>> changelog but it did not help much as the changelogs are of two
>>>>> different versions.
>>>>
>>>> It's mostly just better and better coverage of the language.
>>>>
>>>> The key difference was gcj 4.3, which bumped the spec to 1.5, bringing
>>>> annotations and templates.
>>>
>>> Templates? What are templates?
>>
>> No smiley?
>
> Yeah, sorry, forgot the smiley... :-) there we go
>
>> OK, generics then. Same thing. More or less... :-)
>
> The main difference is ...
Yes, we know, really.
> I was corrected for making the same comparison a long time back when I
> first started working on Classpath (though not by you). So couldn't
> resist the temptation of pointing out they aren't the same ;-)
Ah, that's OK then. :-)
Andrew.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-06 11:37 abhishek desai
2010-01-06 12:03 ` Andrew Haley
2010-01-06 12:59 ` Andrew John Hughes
2010-01-06 13:05 ` Andrew Haley
2010-01-06 13:58 ` Andrew John Hughes
2010-01-06 15:01 ` Andrew Haley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B44A5A5.4020500@redhat.com \
--to=aph@redhat.com \
--cc=gnu_andrew@member.fsf.org \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).